Corrected logarithmic mean temperature difference (CLMTD) and temperature distribution according to cell method – Module ZELL

The ZELL module calculates the steady-state temperature distribution in a shell and tube heat exchanger using the cell method and determines from it the effectively acting temperature difference (CLMTD, corrected logarithmic mean temperature difference).

Module ZELLStandard Module-specificReading time 7 minDE / EN

Engineering task and calculation objective

The ZELL module calculates the steady-state temperature distribution in a shell and tube heat exchanger using the cell method and determines from it the effectively acting temperature difference (CLMTD, corrected logarithmic mean temperature difference). To do this, the apparatus is divided into cells according to its flow configuration — number of tube-side and shell-side passes, number of baffles, cross-counterflow or cross-cocurrent flow; for each cell, the heat balance is solved with the proportionate heat transfer product k·A.

Compared with the classic approach of applying a global correction factor F to the logarithmic mean temperature difference of pure counterflow, the cell model determines the driving temperature difference much more accurately — particularly for few baffles, multi-pass configurations and partial cross-mixing. In addition, local effects become visible that an integral calculation conceals: maximum and minimum temperatures on the tube and shell sides, as well as possible temperature inversions in individual cells, where the temperature difference locally changes sign.

This calculation is needed whenever a heat exchanger rating with a given overall heat transfer coefficient and given heat transfer area is to show which outlet temperatures the apparatus actually achieves — for example when evaluating existing equipment, when reconfiguring flow arrangements, or when the temperature approach is tight.

Calculation workflow

  1. Specify the operating data of both sides: Inlet temperatures, mass flows and specific heat capacities of the tube side and shell side are entered; from these the program forms the heat capacity flows W = m·cp of both sides.
  2. Define the flow configuration and cell division: The number of tube-side and shell-side passes, the number of baffles, the tube rows per cell, and the flow arrangement (cross-counterflow/cross-cocurrent, countercurrent or cocurrent tube flow) determine how the apparatus is divided into cells; the degree of cross-mixing is chosen between unmixed and totally mixed.
  3. Distribute the transfer capability: From the actual overall heat transfer coefficient and the actual heat transfer area, the heat transfer product k·A is formed and distributed evenly over the cells (k·A per cell).
  4. Solve the cell balances: For each cell, the heat balance is solved using the cell efficiencies of both sides; the outlet temperatures of one cell are the inlet temperatures of the downstream cells, until the entire temperature field converges.
  5. Evaluate the results: The output comprises the outlet temperatures of both sides, the logarithmic mean temperature difference of counterflow, the correction factor and the effectively acting temperature difference, as well as extreme temperatures and the maximum temperature inversion in a cell.
Input quantities24 / 38 quantities
QuantitySymbolUnit
Shell-side inlet temperatureta1°C
Tube-side inlet temperatureti1°C
Shell-side outlet temperatureta2°C
Tube-side outlet temperatureti2°C
LMTD countercurrent flowΔTGegK (diff)
FN factorFN-
CLMTD corrected log. mean temperature differenceΔTmK (diff)
Shell-side mass flowmakg/s
Tube-side mass flowmikg/s
Number of tube-side passesNt-
Number of shell-side passesNs-
Number of bafflesNU-
Specific heat capacity tube-sidecp,iJ/(kg·K)
Specific heat capacity shell-sidecp,aJ/(kg·K)
Heat capacity flow shell-side; Ww,a = ma∙cp,aWw,aW/K
Heat capacity flow tube-side; Ww,i = mi∙cp,iWw,iW/K
Actual overall heat transfer coefficientkW/(m²·K)
Actual heat transfer areaA
Number of cellsZellen-
0 = unmixed; 0.5 = mixed(0..0.5)-
Product k∙Ak*AW/K
Product k∙A per cellZelleW/K
Tube-side cell efficiencyinnen-
Shell-side cell efficiencyaußen-

Worked example

For a heat exchanger, determine the shell-side outlet temperature and the logarithmic mean temperature difference of pure counterflow from the energy balance — a worked example of an LMTD calculation. Hot water flows on the tube side, cooling water on the shell side. (The refinement to the effectively acting temperature difference via the correction factor or cell model is handled by the module.)

Given values

Tube-side inlet temperature90 °C
Tube-side outlet temperature50 °C
Tube-side mass flow2.0 kg/s
Shell-side inlet temperature20 °C
Shell-side mass flow3.0 kg/s
Specific heat capacity of both sides4,190 J/(kg·K)

Solution

1

Heat duty from the tube-side balance

Tube-side heat capacity flow: Ww,i = mi · cp,i = 2.0 · 4,190 = 8,380 W/K
Q = Ww,i · (90 − 50) = 8,380 · 40 = 335.2 kW

2

Shell-side outlet temperature

Shell-side heat capacity flow: Ww,a = 3.0 · 4,190 = 12,570 W/K
ϑa,out = 20 + Q / Ww,a = 20 + 335,200 / 12,570 = 46.7 °C

3

Logarithmic mean temperature difference in counterflow

Δϑ₁ = 90 − 46.7 = 43.3 K (hot end), Δϑ₂ = 50 − 20 = 30.0 K (cold end)
Δϑlog = (Δϑ₁ − Δϑ₂) / ln(Δϑ₁/Δϑ₂) = (43.3 − 30.0) / ln(43.3/30.0) = 36.3 K

The effectively acting temperature difference of the apparatus is Δϑreal = F · Δϑlog with F ≤ 1; the module determines the correction factor from the actual flow configuration via the cell model.

Result

Transferred heat duty Q335.2 kW
Shell-side outlet temperature46.7 °C
LMTD in counterflow36.3 K

All values are illustrative. The applicable standard and project-specific boundary conditions remain authoritative.

Frequently asked questions

When is the LMTD with an F correction factor no longer sufficient?

The classic F-factor charts assume ideal conditions: many baffles, complete cross-mixing per baffle compartment and constant fluid properties. For apparatuses with few baffles, several shell-side passes or unusual configurations, the actual driving temperature difference deviates noticeably. The cell method reproduces the real flow arrangement and is then the more accurate tool — it also reveals when the apparatus is operated in a region of steeply falling F-factor, where small data deviations cause large changes in duty.

What does a temperature inversion in a cell mean?

In unfavorable configurations, the temperature of the stream being heated can locally rise above that of the stream being cooled — the driving difference changes sign in that cell and heat is transferred back. The apparatus destroys part of its transfer capability there. The module reports the maximum temperature inversion; if it occurs, the configuration (e.g. number of passes or flow arrangement) should be reconsidered.

What role does the cross-mixing setting play?

The parameter describes how strongly the shell-side stream mixes transverse to the main flow direction: 0 means unmixed partial streams, 0.5 total mixing. Real apparatuses lie in between — baffle clearances and bypass streams mix partially. The choice noticeably affects the calculated correction factor; when in doubt, both limiting cases should be calculated and the spread assessed.

Is the cell method a design or a rating method?

ZELL works as a rating calculation: the actual overall heat transfer coefficient and the actual area are given, and the resulting outlet temperatures and the effectively acting temperature difference are calculated. For design, one works iteratively — area or configuration are varied until the required outlet temperatures are reached.

Related calculations